ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026
Sex-Related Differences in Physiologically-Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and physiologically-based biopharmaceutics (PBBM) modeling are valuable tools in drug development, allowing mechanistic predictions of drug absorption and disposition. However, sex-related differences in gastrointestinal physiology are often underrepresented in virtual populations, potentially limiting prediction accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate how sex-related physiological differences are incorporated into commonly used PBPK platforms and to illustrate their impact on pharmacokinetic predictions using ketoprofen as a case study. Three PBPK platforms were systematically reviewed to assess predefined sex-specific gastrointestinal parameters. All three platforms incorporated sex-related differences in general anatomy and physiology but overlooked sex-specific variability in gastrointestinal tract parameters. In addition, three PBBM models of ketoprofen were developed and verified in males and subsequently extrapolated to females using default and refined sex-specific parameters. Under default female settings, the models overpredicted Cmax and underestimated Tmax, resulting in concentration-time profiles that were nearly indistinguishable from those of males. Refining gastrointestinal tract parameters for females population improved prediction performance and better reflected observed sex differences. These findings indicate that current PBPK platforms may require user-defined adjustments to adequately represent sex-specific gastrointestinal physiology and that incorporating such parameters could lead to more representative PBBM applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.