ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Formation of a Translational Science Professional Identity: A Heuristic Framework and Research Agenda.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based upon substantive professional engagement over two decades and the collective action of diverse professionals, this conceptual paper proposes that translational science (TS) is best understood as a meta-discipline. As with Science, Technology, Education, and Mathematics (STEM) or Information Sciences, meta-disciplines rely on coherent professional identities. Positioning TS in this way foregrounds the need to develop such identities across diverse contributors. TS team members often begin with deep domain-specific expertise followed by acquisition of cross-cutting translational capabilities that together support career and professional outcomes. Despite intensive workforce development efforts, no shared framework describes how Translational Science Professionals (TrSPros [We use TrSPro, "Translational Science Professional," to differentiate from the existing TSP, "Team Science Professional."]) develop professional identities. We adapt an established identity socialization model to TS, offering a heuristic for how contributors across roles become-and belong as-TrSPros. Prior studies in medicine link strong professional identity to job satisfaction, career well-being, resilience, and retention; building identities in TS should likewise increase the capacity and coherence of translation. This paper presents practical strategies and a research agenda to support intentional TrSPro identity development across Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs), their partnering organizations, and the broader TS ecosystem, strengthening the long-term sustainability of translational initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.