ArticleCancer cell international2026
Quantifying target antigen-dependent CAR T-cell performance against AML.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed cancer immunotherapy by genetically engineering T-cells to target tumor antigens. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presents unique challenges due to resistance mechanisms, especially in patients with TP53 loss mutations. The complex dynamics of CAR T-cell expansion remain poorly understood. The field lacks validated quantitative frameworks to systematically evaluate different CAR T-cell target constructs, such as CD33, CD123, and CD371, against resistant AML variants. We address this gap by combining mathematical modeling with in vitro assay data and Bayesian inference. We select, train, and validate a two-compartment deterministic mathematical model that describes the nonlinear dynamics of target AML and CAR T cells, accounting for expansion, killing, and exhaustion. Using Bayesian inference, we train and select the best-performing functional form for CAR T expansion and then validate it on unseen data. Our framework selects a CAR T-cell expansion model that accounts for handling time and T-cell self-interference, highlighting that expansion is a dynamic process in which target-cell handling time and T-cell crowding negatively affect T-cell expansion. Analysis of posterior parameter distributions reveals target-antigen-specific responses against TP53-deficient AML. For instance, CD33-targeting CARs have reduced attack rates against TP53-deficient cells, while CD123- and CD371-targeting CARs show moderately increased attack rates; however, the former exhibit higher death rates, and the latter have increased handling times, impeding efficacy. This target-dependent form of resistance challenges the assumption of uniform performance and reveals a unifying nonlinear expansion model for integrated, yet antigen-specific, preclinical predictions of efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.