Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527808›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

From structure to sequence: A multinomial processing tree model of syntactic encoding.

Jeremy D Yeaton, Grant M Walker, Danielle Fahey, William Matchin, Julius Fridriksson, Gregory Hickok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremy D YeatonDepartment of Language Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. jyeaton@health.ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-8080
Grant M WalkerDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Danielle FaheyDepartment of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
William MatchinDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Julius FridrikssonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Language Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-stage models of grammatical encoding posit that sentence production unfolds in two sequential steps: the construction of a hierarchical syntactic structure, followed by its linearization into a sequence suitable for articulation. While widely accepted in psycho- and neurolinguistics, such models lack formal computational implementations. Here, we introduce a novel multinomial processing tree (MPT) model that operationalizes this two-stage framework to explain syntactic error patterns in individuals with aphasia. Drawing on discourse samples annotated for distinct error types, we fit an MPT model to estimate individual abilities at each processing stage. These ability estimates correlated with observed error rates and localized to distinct neural substrates: hierarchical encoding ability was linked to the posterior superior temporal sulcus and parietal cortex, linearization to posterior inferior frontal regions, and omission-related processes to more dorsal frontal regions and the underlying white matter. Our findings support a neurocomputational dissociation between hierarchical and linear stages of grammatical encoding, aligning with prior lesion-symptom mapping and theoretical accounts of expressive agrammatism and paragrammatism. This work represents the first computational instantiation of a two-stage model of syntactic production, bridging formal modeling and lesion analysis to advance our understanding of the architecture and breakdown of grammatical encoding.

Indexed as

AphasiaPsycholinguisticsHumansParietal LobeComputational modelingLanguage productionNeuroimagingPsycholinguisticsSyntax

Identifiers

PMID42527808
PMCPMC13421263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.