ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Using Machine Learning to Predict Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Interpreting ypTNM After Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common and debilitating sequela of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Although machine learning (ML)-based prediction models have been proposed, few focus exclusively on patients undergoing ALND, and direct comparisons with traditional statistical models remain limited. This study aimed to develop accurate and clinically feasible prediction models for BCRL using supervised ML and multivariable logistic regression.
methodsDemographic and clinical data were prospectively collected from women undergoing unilateral ALND for breast cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2016 and 2024. Supervised ML and multivariable logistic regression models to predict BCRL were trained and internally validated. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score. Shapley additive explanations were used for model interpretability.
resultsA total of 474 eligible patients were included. BCRL developed in 113 (23.8%) patients at a mean ± standard deviation of 16.6 ± 7.5 months postoperatively. The highest-performing ML model (random forest) achieved an AUC of 0.83, whereas traditional multivariable logistic regression achieved an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.62. Key ML predictors of BCRL on Shapley additive explanations analysis included clinical cancer stage, body mass index, age, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
conclusionsML-based models outperformed traditional logistic regression in predicting BCRL among patients undergoing ALND. These models demonstrate the potential of ML for early BCRL identification and risk stratification but also highlight the difficulties in accurately predicting BCRL development. Further research is needed to improve model predictive performance and facilitate clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42527800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.