ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Reliability-Aware View-Adaptive Consensus for 3D Cephalometric Landmark Identification.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis relies on accurate anatomical landmark identification, yet manual annotation is time-consuming and subject to inter- and intra-observer variability. While volumetric convolutional neural networks can improve accuracy, their computational and memory demands limit practical deployment. Multi-view consensus offers an efficient alternative by predicting per-view two-dimensional (2D) heatmaps and fusing them geometrically, but its performance can degrade when view-dependent uncertainty produces unreliable results. We propose a reliability-aware view-adaptive consensus framework for 3D cephalometric landmark identification from CBCT projection views. A shared-weight 2D network predicts per-view 2D heatmaps and landmark reliability scores, which adaptively modulate each view's contribution in an end-to-end differentiable geometric consensus. This framework yields deterministic fusion without stochastic inlier sampling or multi-stage refinement. With 5-fold cross-validation, the proposed method achieved the lowest mean radial error (1.26 mm; 95
Indexed as
Identifiers
42527785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.