Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527785›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Reliability-Aware View-Adaptive Consensus for 3D Cephalometric Landmark Identification.

Min-Hyuk Choi, Jo-Eun Kim, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Sam-Sun Lee, Min-Suk Heo, Won-Jin Yi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min-Hyuk ChoiDepartment of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Jo-Eun KimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Hoe HuhDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sam-Sun LeeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Min-Suk HeoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
Won-Jin YiDepartment of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. wjyi@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy RS-2025-14322975National Research Foundation of Korea 2023R1A2C200532611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis relies on accurate anatomical landmark identification, yet manual annotation is time-consuming and subject to inter- and intra-observer variability. While volumetric convolutional neural networks can improve accuracy, their computational and memory demands limit practical deployment. Multi-view consensus offers an efficient alternative by predicting per-view two-dimensional (2D) heatmaps and fusing them geometrically, but its performance can degrade when view-dependent uncertainty produces unreliable results. We propose a reliability-aware view-adaptive consensus framework for 3D cephalometric landmark identification from CBCT projection views. A shared-weight 2D network predicts per-view 2D heatmaps and landmark reliability scores, which adaptively modulate each view's contribution in an end-to-end differentiable geometric consensus. This framework yields deterministic fusion without stochastic inlier sampling or multi-stage refinement. With 5-fold cross-validation, the proposed method achieved the lowest mean radial error (1.26 mm; 95

Indexed as

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Landmark identificationThree-dimensional cephalometryView-adaptive consensus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.