Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527756›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Detection of mismatching visual kinematics during visuomotor incongruence: A comparison of spatially matched delays versus offsets along identical trajectories.

Fanni Peters, Peng Wang, Jakub Limanowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fanni PetersInstitute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Franz-Mehring-Straße 47, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Peng WangInstitute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Franz-Mehring-Straße 47, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Jakub LimanowskiInstitute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Franz-Mehring-Straße 47, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. jakub.limanowski@uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-5500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introducing delays to visual movement feedback or displacing it in space is a common experimental manipulation to study the neurocomputational basis of self-other distinction. While both manipulations imply spatial (positional) mismatches, there are crucial differences between them, such as the asynchrony of higher-level visual versus motor kinematics (velocity, acceleration, etc.) resulting from added time delays. In this preregistered experiment, we used a continuous elliptical drawing task while presenting visual movement feedback that was congruent or incongruent (i.e., with an added constant time delay or offset). The task allowed the presentation of delayed and offset feedback along identical trajectories, while controlling for the presence of a spatial discrepancy by matching delay and offset levels. Detection and discrimination of delays and offsets was remarkably similar during execution, suggesting comparable perceptual thresholds for visuomotor mismatches resulting from asynchronous versus nonbiological visual kinematics. During mere passive observation of the same feedback, offsets could also be detected above chance level, in line with the known visual sensitivity to violations of kinematic invariants. However, the detection of offsets at medium levels was better during execution, suggesting a benefit of action for identifying nonbiological kinematics in visual movement feedback.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultActionDelayKinematicsOffsetVisionVisuomotor comparisons

Identifiers

PMID42527756
PMCPMC13421240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.