Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527752›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Education and training in low-dose CT lung cancer screening across Europe: a survey study.

Rebecca Mura, Pamela Zolda, Roberta Eufrasia Ledda, David R Baldwin, Georgia Hardavella, Luis Seijo, Anna Kerpel-Fronius, Joanna Chorostowska-Wynimko, Torsten Gerriet Blum, Helmut Prosch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca MuraDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pamela ZoldaDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roberta Eufrasia LeddaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
David R BaldwinRespiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Georgia Hardavella6th Department of Respiratory Medicine, "Sotiria" Athens' Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Luis SeijoDepartment of Pneumology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Anna Kerpel-FroniusDepartment of Radiology, National Korányi Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Joanna Chorostowska-WynimkoDepartment of Genetics and Clinical Immunology, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Warsaw, Poland.
Torsten Gerriet BlumMedical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Helmut ProschDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. helmut.prosch@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-6364

Funding

European Union (EU4Health Programme 2021-2027) 101101187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the status of low-dose CT lung cancer screening (LCS) training practices, identify existing gaps, and define key competencies to be included in LCS educational curricula. MATERIALS AND

methodsAs part of the European SOLACE project, a structured cross-sectional survey consisting of 11 closed- and open-ended items, developed based on relevant literature, international guidelines, and expert input to assess LCS current practices and training needs, was administered to a panel of European LCS experts. Participants were invited to individual Zoom interviews (May-November 2025). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsTwenty-five LCS experts were interviewed from 14 European countries, including 10 radiologists (40%), 8 pulmonologists (32%), 4 thoracic surgeons (16%), 1 project manager (4%), 1 smoking cessation specialist (4%), and 1 general practitioner (GP) (4%). Reported training activities ranged from established programmes (4/14 countries), to learning initiatives (6/14) and/or planned programmes (4/14). Radiologists (96%), pulmonologists (80%), and GPs (60%) were identified as the main target groups for training. On a 6-point Likert scale (0 = not important, 5 = extremely important), experts indicated limited awareness of training needs as the most relevant gap (mean 2.8 ± 2.2). Key educational areas to be strengthened included management of incidental findings (4.5 ± 0.6) and confident use of guidelines for nodule management (3.8 ± 1.8). Among essential competencies for professionals involved in LCS, the highest-rated were competence in managing incidental findings (4.7 ± 0.6), familiarity with guideline-based nodule management (4.7 ± 0.6), basic knowledge of AI tools (4.5 ± 0.8), and communication with LCS participants (4.5 ± 1.1).

conclusionThe findings suggest a heterogeneous LCS training landscape across European countries and underscore the importance of developing shared European curricula. Key priorities may include strengthening technical skills alongside structured communication training. KEY POINTS: Education and training of all stakeholders are essential for the successful implementation of LCS programmes. This survey assesses the current status of LCS training practices across Europe, identifies existing gaps, and defines key competencies to inform future curricula for health professionals involved in LCS. The European LCS training landscape is highly heterogeneous, with substantial variability in training activities, target professionals, and delivery modalities.

Indexed as

EducationLung cancer screeningSOLACETraining

Identifiers

PMID42527752
PMCPMC13421576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.