ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
External validation of population pharmacokinetic models of adalimumab in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: towards model-informed precision dosing.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determination of Hecogenin in Mouse Blood by UPLC-MS/MS and Applied to a Pharmacokinetic Study.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has variability in the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab, which may predispose patients to subtherapeutic concentrations, therapeutic failure, and/or drug immunogenicity. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and allow to personalize therapeutic regimens through Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD). This retrospective, longitudinal study evaluated the predictive performance of six popPK models of adalimumab in adult patients with IBD treated at a tertiary hospital. The adequacy and prediction of the models were externally validated using visual analysis of the goodness-of-fit (GOF) plots, prediction-corrected visual predicted checks (pcVPC), analysis of residuals, and statistical metrics such as the Akaike Information Criteria. Bias and prediction were also calculated using mean prediction error, mean absolute percentage error and root mean square error. Bootstrap resampling was applied for statistical comparisons. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using Bayesian methods and compared to theoretical values. A total of 201 subjects were included, 88% with Crohn's disease, mean age 48.6 (± 16.2) years, 44.8% women. Overall, Berends and Vande Casteele models demonstrated the best predictive performance in the majority of comparative analyses: higher coverage in pcVPC and correlation between observed and predicted values, lower bias and precision values, the lowest AIC, and a homogeneous distribution of residuals. However, both models overestimated adalimumab population clearance. These findings support the application of the Berends and Vande Casteele models in clinical MIPD strategies. Therefore, pending broader evidence in different populations, driving MIPD adoption is critical to optimize adalimumab regimens and maximize sustained clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42527726What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.