ArticleDiscover mental health2026
A mixed-methods evaluation of a psychosocial intervention to reduce mental health stigma among university students.
Article in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFaced with personal and study-related stressors, students in higher education experience elevated levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms while often showing low help-seeking behavior. Although interventions have shown promise in enhancing student well-being, their potential to address stigma, which is closely linked to help-seeking, remains largely unexplored. The present study evaluates The Inquiring Mind (TIM), a Canadian anti-stigma program for post-secondary education, adapted for the German university context, assessing its potential to reduce stigma, increase mental health literacy and encourage continuum beliefs, the understanding of mental health and illness as existing on a spectrum rather than as fixed categories.
methodA sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was applied, using a quasi-experimental online survey (pre-, post- and follow-up assessment), and a subsequent focus group with program participants. A total of 58 students participated. The mixed-methods approach was selected to gain a better understanding of the program's impact and the effectiveness of specific components.
resultsFindings revealed significant reductions in stigma in the intervention group at post-test and a significant increase in continuum beliefs at follow-up. While quantitative results showed no improvements in mental health literacy, qualitative analyses revealed greater awareness of mental health issues and self-stigmatizing processes, as well as improvements in the normality aspect of continuum beliefs. DISCUSSION: Findings support the applicability of TIM in a new cultural context, contributing to research on the emerging concept of continuum beliefs and to the understanding of how interventions can influence post-secondary students' stigma. This systematic evaluation of an early, campus-based prevention program offers relevant insights for developing prevention strategies addressing students' post-pandemic mental health needs across diverse cultural and geographic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.