Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527692›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Reading fiction in early adolescence predicts the ability to imagine our own future.

Anna-Lisa Cohen, Nicholas Buttrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna-Lisa CohenDepartment of Psychology, Yeshiva University, 2495 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY, 10033, USA. acohen11@yu.edu.
Nicholas ButtrickUniversity of WI-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic future thinking is the capacity to mentally simulate events that might occur in one's future. Future thinking and reading fiction, most often studied separately, both rely on the construction and simulation of hypothetical imagined events. We guided participants to simulate an average day 10 years in the future. We predicted that the ability to generate alternatives (cognitive flexibility) and the tendency to become immersed by stories (transportability) would be positively associated with future simulations. Furthermore, we expected that higher habitual reading of fiction in adolescence would be positively associated with these traits. Results showed that greater reading of fiction in middle school, especially the type of fiction that allows readers to encounter different worlds, predicted higher degrees of both cognitive flexibility and transportability in the present day, and both traits were significantly associated with higher vividness and perceived control of the future.

Indexed as

Cognitive FlexibilityImaginationReadingThinkingAdolescentChildFemaleHumansCognitive flexibilityEpisodic future thinkingFuture simulationReading fiction

Identifiers

PMID42527692
PMCPMC13421237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.