ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal cholangiocarcinoma metastases: Clinical outcomes and the role of biologically effective dose thresholds.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a promising modality for improving local tumor control (LTC); however, data on its use for spinal metastases (SM) specifically from cholangiocarcinoma remain limited. In this single-institution retrospective analysis, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS for SM from cholangiocarcinoma, exploring the role of biologically effective dose (BED) thresholds. Demographic, clinical, radiographic, and dosimetric variables, including Bilsky grade, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and BED, were collected. The treatment response was assessed using a combination of radiologic, metabolic, and clinical criteria. Survival outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and statistical analyses accounted for lesion clustering within patients. Seventeen SM identified in eight patients (mean age 68 years; SD± 8.2 years) were analyzed. The mean lesion volume at the time of treatment was 37.4 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
42527634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.