ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Evaluating the Predictive Value of Pre-procedural Diagnostic Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cryoneurolysis.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary on: Evaluating the Predictive Value of Pre-procedural Diagnostic Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cryoneurolysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of pre-cryoneurolysis blocks by comparing outcomes between patients who underwent cryoneurolysis without a pretreatment block and those who underwent cryoneurolysis following a diagnostic block. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective single-center analysis was performed of patients who underwent CT-guided cryoneurolysis for intractable abdominopelvic pain. Patients were categorized according to whether a pre-cryoneurolysis diagnostic block was performed. Clinical success was defined as an improvement in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score of ≥ 3 points. Pre- and post-procedural pain scores and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.
resultsFor entire cohort, including 52 patients who received a pre-cryoneurolysis block and 43 patients who did not, mean VAS score improved from 8.4 ± 1.6 pre-procedurally to 3.9 ± 2.5 at 1 week (p < 0.001), 3.8 ± 2.7 at 1 month (p < 0.001), and 4.8 ± 3.2 at 3 months (p < 0.001) after cryoneurolysis. Use of a pre-cryoneurolysis-block was associated with a mean delay of 16.1 ± 13.5 days (range, 0-50) to cryoneurolysis. Clinical success rates did not differ significantly between the block and non-block groups at 1 week (76.6% [36/47] vs 78.4% [29/37], p = 1.0), 1 month (81.1% [30/37] vs 69.7% [23/33], p = 0.403), or 3 months (62.5% [15/24] vs 75.0% [15/20], p = 0.519). No AEs were observed.
conclusionCT-guided cryoneurolysis provides significant pain relief for cancer- and non-cancer-related chronic abdominopelvic pain, with comparable pain improvement regardless of whether a pre-cryoneurolysis diagnostic block is performed. When the pain source is clearly identified, direct cryoneurolysis may be a reasonable option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42527618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.