Articlenpj health systems2026
Human-in-the-loop AI predictive digital twin to extend virtual precision diabetes care between visits.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human-in-the-loop AI predictive digital twin to extend virtual precision diabetes care between visits.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a 6-month randomized trial, we evaluated a digitally enabled "human-in-the-loop" care support model using a predictive artificial intelligence (AI) digital twin to provide personalized daily short message service (SMS) feedback for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The parent study enrolled 40 adults aged ≥18 years with T2D who completed 3 months of baseline observation followed by a 3-month intervention period, generating 6467 longitudinal data points across weight, dietary intake, physical activity, and glucose monitoring (mean follow-up: 174 days). For this ancillary AI intervention, a subset of 19 participants was randomized to receive either AI-generated individualized daily feedback (AI group, n = 10) or no daily feedback (control group, n = 9). The online human-in-the-loop predictive control model incorporated a transfer-learning artificial neural network predictive digital twin trained on participant self-monitoring data, including weight, food logs, physical activity, and glucose values. A particle swarm optimization controller identified personalized behavioral recommendations aligned with glucose and weight goals, and the digital twin was retrained weekly using newly accrued data. The model achieved ≥80% prediction accuracy across all diet-condition subgroups. During the intervention period, participants receiving AI-generated feedback demonstrated trends toward increased daily step counts and improved adherence to caloric and carbohydrate intake targets. The AI intervention group achieved significantly greater weight loss than controls (mean loss 5.87 lbs vs 3.57 lbs; p < 0.012) while maintaining stable glucose levels throughout the study period (p = 0.661). These findings suggest that AI-enabled predictive digital twin models may offer a scalable approach for extending precision diabetes self-management support beyond clinic visits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.