ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Summary of the evidence for perioperative nutritional management of TIPS in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.
Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to search, evaluate, and summarize the existing evidence on perioperative nutritional management of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension (CPH) and provide the basis for evidence-based clinical practice. According to the "6S" model of evidence-based sources, the evidence on perioperative nutrition management of TIPS in patients with CPH from relevant databases and websites was systematically searched, including clinical decisions, guidelines, expert consensus, systematic review, and evidence summary. The search range is from the establishment of the databases to August 17, 2024. Two authors independently screened the literature following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the literature was evaluated by a total of 4 authors using appropriate tools, including Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II), the evaluation tool of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Evidence-Based Health Care Center, and CASE (Critical Appraisal for Summaries of Evidence). Two authors were responsible for extracting and summarizing the evidence. The level of evidence was classified according to the JBI Evidence Pre-Classification and Evidence Recommendation Level System (2014 version). A total of 18 articles were included, including 3 clinical decisions, 6 guidelines, 6 expert consensuses, 2 evidence summaries, and 1 systematic review. 30 pieces of evidence covering 5 key themes were summarized: nutritional risk screening and status assessment, nutritional goals, nutritional support modalities and measures, nutritional management of complications, and follow-up and education. This study systematically retrieved and evaluated the existing evidence on perioperative nutritional management in patients with CPH undergoing TIPS. On the basis of the current level of evidence, this study proposed a preliminary framework for perioperative nutritional management and suggests that future high-quality prospective studies be conducted to further clarify the relevant recommendations. In clinical practice, healthcare professionals should exercise professional judgment, integrating clinical conditions with patient preferences, habits, and tolerability when applying the evidence.
Identifiers
42527575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.