Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527540›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2026

Towards a neurobiology of early intervention: the importance of critical periods for preventive psychiatry and youth mental health.

Peter J Uhlhaas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter J UhlhaasDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. peter.uhlhaas@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0892-2224

Funding

Einstein Stiftung Berlin (Einstein Foundation Berlin) EZ-2025-852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence has accumulated that youth, the period between 12-25 years, may constitute a crucial period for the early detection and intervention of mental disorders. Thus, there is emerging evidence that targeted psycho-social and pharmacological interventions have potential to improve clinical outcomes in at-risk individuals as well as in youths with a first-episode of mental illness. However, while support for the early intervention paradigm has gained momentum, an explanatory framework for the emergence of mental disorders as well as for the mechanisms of preventive interventions is currently not available. Here, I will outline a neurobiology of early intervention that will highlight the importance of linking emerging psychopathology with developmental neuroscience and systems biology. Specifically, I will propose that critical periods during late brain development in combination with environmental exposures could account for the elevated occurrence of psychosis, affective disorders, substance abuse and personality disorders. In addition, the neurobiological mechanisms underlying critical periods could be important for understanding the potential of preventive interventions and the identification of biomarkers. Together, a neurobiological grounding of early intervention could provide a conceptual and empirical framework to advance early detection and prevention of mental disorders during youth.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.