ReviewMolecular psychiatry2026
Towards a neurobiology of early intervention: the importance of critical periods for preventive psychiatry and youth mental health.
Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence has accumulated that youth, the period between 12-25 years, may constitute a crucial period for the early detection and intervention of mental disorders. Thus, there is emerging evidence that targeted psycho-social and pharmacological interventions have potential to improve clinical outcomes in at-risk individuals as well as in youths with a first-episode of mental illness. However, while support for the early intervention paradigm has gained momentum, an explanatory framework for the emergence of mental disorders as well as for the mechanisms of preventive interventions is currently not available. Here, I will outline a neurobiology of early intervention that will highlight the importance of linking emerging psychopathology with developmental neuroscience and systems biology. Specifically, I will propose that critical periods during late brain development in combination with environmental exposures could account for the elevated occurrence of psychosis, affective disorders, substance abuse and personality disorders. In addition, the neurobiological mechanisms underlying critical periods could be important for understanding the potential of preventive interventions and the identification of biomarkers. Together, a neurobiological grounding of early intervention could provide a conceptual and empirical framework to advance early detection and prevention of mental disorders during youth.
Identifiers
42527540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.