Articlenpj health systems2026
Trustworthy AI models to predict prolonged hospital length-of-stay in orthopedic surgery.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed and validated a trustworthy and uncertainty-aware artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) framework for predicting prolonged hospital length-of-stay (LOS) in orthopedic inpatient surgery using exclusively preoperative clinical and procedural data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). LOS prediction was formulated as a binary classification task using two clinically relevant thresholds (LOS > 2 days and LOS > 5 days), with primary emphasis on the 5-day cutoff due to its greater clinical interpretability. Random Forest, Multilayer Perceptron, Deep Neural Network, and XGBoost models were trained using CPT-based procedure groupings and evaluated using five-fold stratified cross-validation within the 85% training cohort, with final independent evaluation performed on a completely unseen 15% hold-out test set. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, macro-averaged precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Across models, the 5-day threshold demonstrated the most stable and clinically meaningful performance, while results under the 2-day threshold confirmed robustness to alternative outcome definitions. The Optuna-optimized XGBoost model achieved the strongest discrimination, favorable calibration, and narrow uncertainty bounds. Algorithmic fairness was evaluated across age, sex, and race using selection rates and true positive rates, with broadly consistent subgroup performance across demographic groups. Model explainability using SHAP and LIME identified case type, CPT category, anesthesia type, and baseline physiologic status (e.g., ASA class and hematocrit) as key drivers of prolonged LOS, while patient-level explanations supported clinical plausibility. This preoperative-only and trustworthy AI framework enables transparent and equitable risk stratification to support perioperative planning, optimized bed and discharge management, and data-driven utilization management and prior authorization workflows in orthopedic care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.