Articlenpj health systems2026
Beyond fingerprint and voice print: cough sequence sound for identity verification.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional speaker verification systems rely on speech-based features such as fundamental frequency, resonance, and spectral characteristics. In clinical and remote monitoring settings where patients may be unable or unwilling to speak, non-speech sounds like coughs could provide a passive biometric signal for identity verification. While prior research has shown that individual coughs carry identity-specific features, most studies rely on single, voluntary coughs collected in controlled settings, limiting generalizability. Here, we investigated whether cough sequences contain sufficient information for speaker verification. We used the Coswara dataset, which contains 2746 cough recordings. The ECAPA-TDNN (Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation, and Aggregation in Time Delay Neural Network) model, pre-trained on VoxCeleb, was adapted for cough-specific features. Speaker embeddings were extracted using SpeechBrain. Rejection rates were calculated by comparing shallow and heavy coughs from the same user, while false acceptance rates were computed by comparing a user's shallow cough with another's heavy cough. Equal Error Rate (EER) balanced false acceptance and rejection rates, while the F1 score measured precision and recall. We achieved an EER of 13.39% with an F1 score of 0.8559, indicating strong performance. Cosine distance between model embeddings effectively distinguished between genuine and impostor cough samples, confirming the model's ability to verify identity using cough sounds. We demonstrate the feasibility of using cough sequences for speaker verification, highlighting coughs as a viable signal for identity verification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.