Articlenpj health systems2026
Understanding implementation contexts and determinants of e-learning for global health security competency-based training in LMICs.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
E-learning offers great benefits and potential to improve the capability of the public health workforce to prevent, detect, and respond to public health emergencies. This study aims to identify the implementation contexts and determinants of multi-communication online training (MOT) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we mapped previously established MOT constraints and enablers onto its five domains and 39 constructs to determine implementation contexts and determinants, respectively. Overall, contexts for constraints and enablers to MOT implementation were established across all five domains of CFIR, with 16 determinants identified. The contexts were mostly linked to intervention (26.7%), followed by inner setting (23.3%), outer setting (23.3%), process (20.0%), and individuals (6.7%). The top three implementation determinants of MOT identified were intervention design (16.7%), outer setting policies and laws (13.3%), and outer setting local conditions and inner setting available resources (10.0%). These findings could be used to guide evidence-informed selection of strategies and prioritization of efforts and resources for e-learning implementation to improve global health security competency-based training in LMICs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.