Articlenpj health systems2026
Responsible AI for safer opioid risk management in older adults.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults face elevated opioid-related risks driven by multimorbidity, altered pharmacokinetics, and polypharmacy. We present a hybrid digital health framework that integrates a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network for temporal risk prediction with a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) module for evidence-grounded clinical explanation tailored to adults aged ≥65 years. Using de-identified Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data from 2016 to 2022, the system predicts opioid risk classification, Beers medication safety level, and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) status, achieving macro-F1 scores of 0.72, 0.77, and 0.84, respectively. To support interpretability and safety, explanations are generated from a curated clinical knowledge base incorporating the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) opioid guidance, the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria, and geriatric pharmacotherapy literature. Retrieval-grounded reasoning, uncertainty signaling, and clinician-review cautions are embedded to mitigate unsupported inferences and automation bias. The framework is designed to align with PDMP-style data flows and incorporates Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) context to account for area-level determinants relevant to opioid stewardship. By coupling temporal prediction with verifiable, guideline-grounded explanations, this work illustrates an operational, responsible-AI design approach for transparent and clinician-centered decision support in opioid management for ageing populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.