Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527461›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2025

MuTATE: an interpretable multi-endpoint machine learning framework for automated molecular subtyping in cancer.

Sarah G Ayton, Martina Pavlicova, Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza, Rita Q Fuentes-Aguilar, Debora Garza-Hernandez, Emmanuel Martínez-Ledesma, Jose Gerardo Tamez-Peña, Mario R Garcia-Pompermayer, Víctor Treviño

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah G AytonTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico. sarah.ayton@columbia.edu.
Martina PavlicovaColumbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Carla Daniela Robles-EspinozaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Laboratorio Internacional de Investigación sobre el Genoma Humano, Campus Juriquilla, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Rita Q Fuentes-AguilarTecnologico de Monterrey, The Institute of Advanced Materials and Sustainable Manufacturing, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Debora Garza-HernandezTecnologico de Monterrey, The Institute for Obesity Research, Monterrey, Mexico.
Emmanuel Martínez-LedesmaTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Jose Gerardo Tamez-PeñaTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Mario R Garcia-PompermayerTecnologico de Monterrey, Hospital San Jose, TecSalud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Víctor TreviñoTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico. vtrevino@tec.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective and interpretable molecular subtyping is critical for cancer risk stratification and treatment, yet existing methods face key limitations. Traditional models cannot jointly model multiple clinical endpoints, limiting prognostic utility, while machine learning (ML) approaches often lack transparency. We developed MuTATE, an automated, interpretable decision-tree framework powered by ML that improves subtyping accuracy and enables multi-endpoint risk stratification. MuTATE was evaluated using 18,400 simulations and 682 patient biopsies from three TCGA cancers: lower-grade glioma (LGG), endometrial carcinoma (EC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). Compared to established clinical models, MuTATE improved accuracy, interpretability, and biomarker discovery, and reclassified risk groups. In LGG, MuTATE reassigned 13% of "low-risk" IDH-1p19q cases into higher-risk subtypes, and 19% of "high-risk" IDH wild-type cases were reassigned to higher-risk categories. In GA, MuTATE refined the "intermediate-risk" genomically stable group into a higher-risk ARID1A wild-type subtype. In EC, 72% of "intermediate-risk" MSI/MLH1 cases were reassigned to the highest-risk category. These findings demonstrate MuTATE's potential to reduce diagnostic bias, improve risk stratification, and support scalable integration of multi-endpoint ML into precision oncology workflows.

Identifiers

PMID42527461
PMCPMC13354218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.