Articlenpj health systems2025
MuTATE: an interpretable multi-endpoint machine learning framework for automated molecular subtyping in cancer.
Article in npj health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective and interpretable molecular subtyping is critical for cancer risk stratification and treatment, yet existing methods face key limitations. Traditional models cannot jointly model multiple clinical endpoints, limiting prognostic utility, while machine learning (ML) approaches often lack transparency. We developed MuTATE, an automated, interpretable decision-tree framework powered by ML that improves subtyping accuracy and enables multi-endpoint risk stratification. MuTATE was evaluated using 18,400 simulations and 682 patient biopsies from three TCGA cancers: lower-grade glioma (LGG), endometrial carcinoma (EC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GA). Compared to established clinical models, MuTATE improved accuracy, interpretability, and biomarker discovery, and reclassified risk groups. In LGG, MuTATE reassigned 13% of "low-risk" IDH-1p19q cases into higher-risk subtypes, and 19% of "high-risk" IDH wild-type cases were reassigned to higher-risk categories. In GA, MuTATE refined the "intermediate-risk" genomically stable group into a higher-risk ARID1A wild-type subtype. In EC, 72% of "intermediate-risk" MSI/MLH1 cases were reassigned to the highest-risk category. These findings demonstrate MuTATE's potential to reduce diagnostic bias, improve risk stratification, and support scalable integration of multi-endpoint ML into precision oncology workflows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.