ArticleScientific reports2026
SignatureGuard: hybrid CNN-transformer model for signature verification and identification across Arabic and English datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Offline signature verification has a persistent Latin-script bias: most systems are built and evaluated on English datasets, while Arabic and other non-Latin scripts are largely absent from the benchmarking literature. SignatureGuard is a three-task framework that evaluates six hybrid CNN-transformer architectures on two offline signature benchmarks (one Arabic, ASVAR; one English, CEDAR) under a single shared preprocessing and training pipeline, enabling direct architectural comparison across writing systems. The three tasks are binary forgery detection, multi-class biometric identification, and forgery source identification. To address the Arabic data gap, we publicly released ASVAR: 3471 images (1712 genuine, 1759 forged) from 70 individuals. Hybrid pairings of EfficientNetB7 or ResNet50 with the Vision Transformer (ViT-B/16) achieve test accuracies of 98.2% and 98.4% on forgery detection, macro-F1 above 0.97, and Cohen's κ above 0.96; 95% Wilson confidence intervals (±1.5 pp) confirm these are not artefacts of finite test-set size. MobileNetV2-based hybrids trail by at most 0.7 percentage points. Architectural rankings are broadly consistent across both datasets. All results are obtained under a seen-writer, image-level 80/10/10 split-a closed-set protocol that supports reproducible architectural comparison but overestimates real-world deployment performance; a signer-disjoint evaluation is identified as the primary follow-on experiment. An information-theoretic argument demonstrates that the hybrid classification head cannot perform worse than either frozen component in isolation. Confusion-matrix analysis, multi-seed validation, and backbone fine-tuning are recommended as extensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.