ArticleBone research2026
Fgfr3-Wnt signaling crosstalk is involved in maintaining cranial suture integrity.
Article in Bone research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cranial suture formation is a dynamic process that requires precise cellular and molecular coordination to regulate bone growth and maintain suture homeostasis. The Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 (FGFR3) signaling pathway is among the major pathways disrupted in craniosynostosis; however, its precise role during cranial suture formation is still unknown. Using a relevant fgfr3 LoF zebrafish model exhibiting abnormal suture morphology, we demonstrated for the first time that Fgfr3 plays a pleiotropic role in both the formation and maintenance of cranial sutures. Transmission electron microscopy and second harmonic generation imaging revealed that Fgfr3 is essential for the proper organization of the collagen network within the suture. Using specific transgenic reporter lines, we showed that Fgfr3 is crucial for regulating osteogenesis in this region. Specifically, Fgfr3 limits the number of osteoprogenitors at the osteogenic front and promotes osteoblast maturation at the suture edge. RNAscope analyses further revealed that loss of Fgfr3 led to significant upregulation of fgf18 expression. Finally, our findings show that loss of Fgfr3 results in the activation of the canonical Wnt pathway, and possibly the BMP pathway, within cranial sutures. Pharmacological inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling during suture development using the β-catenin inhibitor XAV939 restored fgf18 expression, partially normalized levels of the BMP antagonist grem1, reduced SMAD1/5 phosphorylation, and produced a significant improvement in cranial suture morphology. In conclusion, these findings position Fgfr3 as a central regulator of cranial suture formation and homeostasis, acting through intricate cross-talk between the FGF, canonical Wnt, and possibly BMP signaling pathways. These data offer new insights into the biology of cranial suture and FGFR3-related craniosynostoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.