Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527154›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing management2026

Systemic Organizational Changes in Health Care and Their Implications for Job Crafting in Nursing: A Systematic Review.

Jolanta Lubaś, Jadwiga Klukow, Joanna Czerwik-Marcinkowska, Sylwia Skorupska, Szymon Zmorzyński

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jolanta LubaśDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Health, State University of Applied Sciences in Krosno, Rynek Street 1, 34-400, Krosno, Poland, pwsz.konin.edu.pl.
Jadwiga KlukowChair of Nursing Management and Clinical Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Academy of Zamosc, Pereca Street 2, 22-400, Zamosc, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1243-9531
Joanna Czerwik-MarcinkowskaInstitute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Stefana Żeromskiego Street 5, 25-369, Kielce, Poland, ujk.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-7819
Sylwia SkorupskaInstitute of Human Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Academy of Zamosc, Pereca Street 2, 22-400, Zamosc, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1279-2021
Szymon ZmorzyńskiInstitute of Human Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Academy of Zamosc, Pereca Street 2, 22-400, Zamosc, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2039-2908

Funding

Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki SUPB.RN.21.234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShaping the work environment in nursing reflects the concept of job crafting, which involves proactive strategies by nurses to redefine tasks, social interactions, and cognitive framing of work, aiming to increase its perceived significance and job satisfaction. The systematic review aims to comprehensively synthesize all relevant research evidence on job crafting within the framework of the healthcare system. METHODOLOGY: A review was conducted, using a systematic search of selected literature related to job crafting in the healthcare system, with a particular focus on nurses. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search included studies published between January 2015 and January 2025. The prepared review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. A predefined search strategy was systematically applied to the identified records. The work was registered in the PROSPERO database.

resultsA total of twenty-five full-text records were included in the final review. Based on the analysis of key domains, such as work engagement (including work efficiency), commitment to work, job satisfaction, intention to remain in the profession, quality of care, and burnout, directions for the development of job crafting were identified. A review of studies indicates that job crafting is positively and significantly associated with work engagement, commitment to work, and job satisfaction (r = 0.22-0.70) and negatively associated with burnout (r = -0.41 to -0.24). Although individual analyses have reported a lack of statistical significance or different directions of dependence, the overall picture confirms the beneficial role of job crafting for employee well-being. Additionally, the analysis highlighted the need for further research in these areas. While numerous studies have examined the concept of job crafting in nursing, the review underscores a persistent gap in the literature, specifically concerning the linkage between employee motivation and proactive modifications of the work environment.

conclusionsJob crafting can help to reduce burnout among nurses by enabling them to adapt their tasks, relationships, and perceptions of work. Higher levels of job crafting are associated with greater work engagement, job satisfaction, and intention to remain in the profession, particularly when it involves modifying tasks and relationships. Job crafting is facilitated by autonomy, a supportive organizational culture, and supervisory support but hindered by rigid procedures, heavy workloads, staff shortages, and limited decision-making opportunities. Although nurses' knowledge, experience, and interpersonal skills are keys to effective job crafting, organizational systems often fail to utilize these competencies.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareOrganizational InnovationWorking ConditionsBurnout, ProfessionalHumansJob Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42527154
PMCPMC13420345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.