Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42527111›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2026

New-onset diabetes after distal pancreatectomy-findings from a national cohort study.

Henrik Bergenfeldt, Katarina Fagher, Caroline Williamsson, Bodil Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henrik BergenfeldtDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7215-746X
Katarina FagherDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-2576
Caroline WilliamssonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-3149
Bodil AnderssonDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5591-0659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Pancreatic resection is associated with a high frequency of postoperative new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). The present study aimed to quantify the rate and investigate potential risk factors for NODM after distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Data on patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy between 2010 and 2020 were obtained from the Swedish National Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer Registry and cross-referenced with the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Uni- and multivariable competing risk regression analyses were conducted to model sub-distribution hazards (SHR) of NODM between groups. Results: A total of 1,034 patients were included, with 290 (28%) developing NODM postoperatively. The risk of NODM was reduced for female patients (SHR 0.73, Conclusions: NODM was common among patients after distal pancreatectomy, with several patient and surgical factors influencing risk. A minimally-invasive approach was associated with a lower risk of NODM after surgery. This association warrants further study, but should be interpreted cautiously due to potential selection bias and residual confounding, but it warrants further study.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusDistal pancreatectomyOutcomePancreatic resectionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42527111
PMCPMC13490728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.