ArticleBMJ open2026
HYPOChLorous Acid TEsting Studies in percutaneous DRAINAGE (HYPOCLATES:DRAINAGE): protocol for a single-centre, controlled, ambispective cohort study comparing hypochlorous acid versus saline irrigation in percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPercutaneous drainage is the standard of care for intra-abdominal abscesses. Additional saline irrigation provides mechanical cleansing but lacks antimicrobial activity. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), an endogenous antiseptic with broad-spectrum microbicidal activity and high tissue compatibility, is a promising alternative for intracavitary infection control. This study evaluates whether HOCl irrigation shortens the indwelling time of percutaneous irrigation drains and systemic antibiotic duration compared with saline irrigation in patients with intra-abdominal abscesses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Following an institutional change in routine practice on 1 December 2025, this single-centre, controlled, ambispective cohort study at the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, compares a prospectively followed cohort treated with continuous HOCl-containing irrigation (Granudacyn) with a non-concurrent, retrospectively assembled saline cohort from the preceding period. Both cohorts include drains managed with continuous high-volume irrigation (at least 1 L per 24 h for a minimum of 3 consecutive days). The primary endpoints are the indwelling time of the index irrigation drain (placement to removal) and the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy. Secondary endpoints include hospital and intensive care unit stay, reinterventions, complication severity (Clavien-Dindo), time to fistula closure and infection-related parameters. Confounding is addressed using propensity-score methods, and time-to-event endpoints are analysed accounting for competing events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University's Medical Faculty (S-520/2025). As pseudonymised routine clinical data are used without additional patient contact or deviation from standard care, individual informed consent is waived in accordance with the national regulations and General Data Protection Regulation. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00038653.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.