Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42526917›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction following laparoscopic urological surgery: a protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

Linhong Wang, Guanhua Qiu, Yuqi Li, Lifang Chen, Bin Yang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07133620 (The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction After Urological Laparoscopic Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07133620 narecruitingnot on this map

The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Postoperative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction After Urological Laparoscopic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled112ConditionsPostoperative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction (POGD)ArmsTranscutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation, Sham transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linhong WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Guanhua QiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuqi LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Lifang ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Bin YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China yangbin4332@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6604-5565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe incidence of urinary tract tumours is increasing annually, and laparoscopic surgery is currently the predominant surgical method employed in clinical practice. Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) is one of the most prevalent adverse events associated with patients who receive laparoscopic surgery. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) may be an effective treatment for POGD. This study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TEAS for POGD following urological laparoscopic surgery.

methodsThis is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. A total of 112 urological patients will be randomly assigned to either the TEAS group or the sham TEAS group at a ratio of 1:1. Each group of patients received a total of two treatments, one prior to surgery and one in the post-anaesthesia recovery room (PACU) after surgery, with each treatment lasting 30 min. The intervention group received TEAS treatment at bilateral Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36) and Ciliao (BL32) acupoints. Once patients achieved an effective sensation of 'deqi' at these points, the TEAS intensity was adjusted to the maximum tolerable level and maintained for 30 min. The primary outcome will be the score of intake, feeling nauseated, emesis, physical exam and duration of symptoms (I-FEED) on the day 3 postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will include the time of first postoperative flatus and defecation, 5 days postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and the Quality of Recovery Scale (QoR-15), and preoperative 1-day and postoperative 5-day measurements of platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), acetylcholine (Ach), norepinephrine (NE) concentration levels, motilin (MTL), and microRNA-10b-5p (miR-10b-5p) concentration levels. The safety of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation will also be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. The results of the study will be disseminated through a variety of channels, including peer-reviewed open-access publications, scientific conferences and targeted communications with patient organisations, healthcare providers and the broader public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07133620.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsGastrointestinal DiseasesLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUrologic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAcupunctureANAESTHETICSGASTROENTEROLOGYUROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID42526917
PMCPMC13423161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.