ReviewActa biomaterialia2026
Engineering heterogeneous tissues and organs via multi-material bioprinting: Advances, challenges, and opportunities.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Native tissues and organs exhibit intrinsic heterogeneity in their structural, compositional, and functional properties, which poses significant challenges towards the development of effective functional substitutes. Multi-material three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising strategy to address these challenges by enabling enhanced spatial control over the deposition of biomaterials, signaling factors, and diverse cell types. This capability facilitates the fabrication of heterogeneous tissue constructs that aim to approach the complexity of native tissues, although achieving sub-micron biomimicry remains restricted by current hardware limitations. Recent advances, such as the development of multi-nozzle systems, multi-ink platforms, and the incorporation of heterogeneous cell aggregates, have substantially enhanced the capacity to reproduce tissue heterogeneity with greater precision and scalability. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamental concepts and classifications of multi-material bioprinting. Four representative heterogeneous tissues/organs-osteochondral tissue, trachea, liver, and heart-were selected for in-depth discussion, given their rising clinical significance and escalating bioprinting challenges imposed by their structural and physiological complexity. Furthermore, bioprinting of these tissues/organs covers critical concerns including stiffness, interface connection, biological function, and vascularization. In addition, this Review critically examines the current challenges in the field and offers a forward-looking perspective on emerging trends and potential breakthroughs in technologies in the context of multi-material bioprinting. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review elaborates on multi-material bioprinting strategies for fabricating heterogeneous tissues and organs. It proposes a classification and definition of heterogeneity at multiple levels, including structural, compositional, and functional aspects, in both native tissues and 3D bioprinting approaches. Moreover, various 3D bioprinting modalities are discussed, encompassing both nozzle-based and nozzle-free techniques, together with their applications in representative heterogeneous organs. This work offers critical insights by addressing current limitations and future opportunities. Together, this review comprehensively categorizes heterogeneous tissue fabrication strategies across diverse multi-material bioprinting approaches, providing a holistic framework for advancing the design and fabrication of next-generation heterogeneous tissues and organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.