Trial reportBrain stimulation
Effects of personalized transcranial magnetic stimulation on social cognitive network functional connectivity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled target engagement trial.
Trial report in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neuromodulation of Social Cognitive Circuitry in People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
iTBS to Enhance Social Cognition in People With Psychosis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSchizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) often feature debilitating social cognitive impairments, with limited treatment options. This study used a target engagement approach to examine the effects of individually-targeted repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) on social cognitive network functional connectivity (i.e., mentalizing and simulation networks) in individuals with SSDs.
methodsWe conducted a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial in adults with SSDs (NCT04418011). Participants received two weeks of DMPFC stimulation with 10 Hz rTMS, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), or sham stimulation. They completed pre- and post-treatment functional magnetic resonance imaging, including a social processing task. Treatment was personalized using functional connectivity mapping and electric field modelling. Primary outcomes were changes in individualized within-mentalizing and between mentalizing-simulation network functional connectivity after active stimulation versus sham, compared using effect sizes. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability.
resultsAnalyses included 46 participants who completed treatment (10 Hz rTMS: n = 15; iTBS: n = 15; sham: n = 16). iTBS produced a significantly greater increase in within-mentalizing network connectivity, with a large effect size, while 10 Hz rTMS did not differ from sham. Effects on between-network connectivity were negligible-to-small for both active conditions. Participants receiving iTBS reported higher pain ratings, but adverse event and discontinuation rates did not differ across groups.
conclusionsIndividualized DMPFC-targeted iTBS demonstrated target engagement via increased mentalizing network connectivity relative to sham, and was feasible, safe, and well-tolerated in adults with SSDs. A larger and longer clinical trial powered to assess change in social cognitive outcomes is ongoing (NCT06118268).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.