ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Metabolic checkpoints in bone remodeling: from dysregulation to targeted therapies.
Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone remodeling depends on a tightly regulated metabolic crosstalk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The article advances a hypothesis‑driven framework that positions discrete metabolic checkpoints ‒ glycolytic flux, mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS), amino‑acid utilization, and ion‑channel-coupled calcium signaling ‒ as tractable levers for restoring formation-resorption balance. The authors explicitly examine metabolic heterogeneity within and across osteolineages and disease contexts, integrate immune-metabolic coupling that links TCA‑cycle intermediates to RANKL/OPG regulation, and synthesize evidence on the efficacy and trade‑offs of current and emerging therapies (e.g., sclerostin/Wnt restoration, RANKL blockade, HIF‑1α modulation, and calcium‑channel targeting). To avoid over‑interpretation, clinical statements are constrained to the strength of available evidence; preclinical findings are labeled accordingly. The authors further propose a pragmatic framework for precision modulation ‒ rather than blanket inhibition ‒ of metabolic pathways to minimize off‑target toxicity and enable context‑dependent benefit. This consolidated view reframes metabolic dysfunction as a driver of skeletal pathology and a blueprint for targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.