Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42526167›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Sustained During Military Service for Men Aged Between 61 and 80 Years.

Brian C J Moore, Petra von Gablenz, Graham Cox, Judy R Dubno, Lauren K Dillard, David Lowe, Hedwig E Gockel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brian C J MooreCambridge Hearing Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-0671
Petra von GablenzInstitute of Hearing Technology and Audiology and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All.connects'', Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7346-7950
Graham CoxENT Department (retired), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-4721
Lauren K DillardDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
David LoweENT Department, James Cook University Hospital, Cleveland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-0065
Hedwig E GockelCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-2068

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recently described method (rM-NIHL) for diagnosing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) sustained during military service for men aged up to 60 years was developed based on the shapes of the audiograms of noise-exposed military personnel and a control group matched in age but without known noise exposure. Here, the applicability of the rM-NIHL method to men aged 61 to 80 years was evaluated, based on a database including 329 military noise-exposed men (ExpDB) and a database including 123 non-exposed men (ContDB). The method had high sensitivity but poor specificity. For further analysis, ExpDB was randomly split into ExpDB1 and ExpDB2, and ContDB was randomly split into ContDB1 and ContDB2. ExpDB1 and ContDB1 were used for the development of new methods and ExpDB2 and ContDB2 were used for evaluation. Modification of the criteria used in the rM-NIHL method led to a better balance between sensitivity and specificity, but the overall diagnostic performance was only moderate. A new method, denoted M-NIHL60+, was developed based on a weighted average of the age-corrected hearing thresholds across all frequencies from 1 to 8 kHz. This method gave a reasonable balance between sensitivity and specificity and gave higher diagnostic performance than the original rM-NIHL method or the rM-NIHL method with modified criteria. Comparison of data for older and younger exposed groups (assessed previously) supported the hypothesis that the rate of change of thresholds with age for noise-exposed individuals is greater for frequencies where the initial NIHL is small than for frequencies where it is large.

Indexed as

Audiometry, Pure-ToneHearing Loss, Noise-InducedMilitary PersonnelNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAuditory AcuityAuditory ThresholdHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Testsdiagnosiseffects of agenoise-induced hearing lossolder menprogression of hearing loss

Identifiers

PMID42526167
PMCPMC13424519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.