ArticleTrends in hearing
Diagnosing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Sustained During Military Service for Men Aged Between 61 and 80 Years.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A recently described method (rM-NIHL) for diagnosing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) sustained during military service for men aged up to 60 years was developed based on the shapes of the audiograms of noise-exposed military personnel and a control group matched in age but without known noise exposure. Here, the applicability of the rM-NIHL method to men aged 61 to 80 years was evaluated, based on a database including 329 military noise-exposed men (ExpDB) and a database including 123 non-exposed men (ContDB). The method had high sensitivity but poor specificity. For further analysis, ExpDB was randomly split into ExpDB1 and ExpDB2, and ContDB was randomly split into ContDB1 and ContDB2. ExpDB1 and ContDB1 were used for the development of new methods and ExpDB2 and ContDB2 were used for evaluation. Modification of the criteria used in the rM-NIHL method led to a better balance between sensitivity and specificity, but the overall diagnostic performance was only moderate. A new method, denoted M-NIHL60+, was developed based on a weighted average of the age-corrected hearing thresholds across all frequencies from 1 to 8 kHz. This method gave a reasonable balance between sensitivity and specificity and gave higher diagnostic performance than the original rM-NIHL method or the rM-NIHL method with modified criteria. Comparison of data for older and younger exposed groups (assessed previously) supported the hypothesis that the rate of change of thresholds with age for noise-exposed individuals is greater for frequencies where the initial NIHL is small than for frequencies where it is large.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.