Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42526089›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Multidrug-resistance in backyard poultry and their link to management and biosecurity conditions in Eastern Spain.

Fernando Carrasquer, Ana Marco-Fuertes, Laura Montoro-Dasi, Nicla Gentile, Vasilios Tsiouris, Clara Marin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fernando CarrasquerH&N International GmbH, Cuxhaven, 27472, Germany; Institute of Science and Animal Technology, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.
Ana Marco-FuertesFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain.
Laura Montoro-DasiFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain.
Nicla GentileInstitute of Science and Animal Technology, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, 46022, Spain.
Vasilios TsiourisUnit of Avian Medicine, Clinic of Farm Animals, School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Clara MarinFacultad de Veterinaria, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, 46115, Spain. Electronic address: clara.marin@uchceu.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative poultry production systems are increasing due to consumer concerns regarding conventional farming practices and the growing demand for more sustainable systems that promote animal welfare. In this context, backyard poultry keeping for hobby or self-consumption purposes has become increasingly common in both rural and urban areas. However, unlike commercial poultry production, these flocks are often managed with limited biosecurity and sanitary measures, and their role in the maintenance and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the epidemiological situation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in backyard poultry farms in eastern Spain using Escherichia coli as an environmental sentinel bacterium. Owners of backyard poultry across eastern Spain were invited to voluntary take. Epidemiological data on flock management and biosecurity practices were collected to evaluate farm biosecurity levels. For E. coli isolation, cloacal swabs were obtained from up to six hens per farm, and two environmental surface wipes were collected from each facility. In total, 33 backyard poultry farms from 24 localities were randomly sampled. The survey revealed a wide range of biosecurity levels, with low (36.4%) and moderate (57.6%) biosecurity levels being the most common. Overall, 246 samples were collected, yielding 216 E. coli isolates, including 168 from animal samples and 48 from environmental samples. Among animal isolates, 95.8% showed resistance to at least one antimicrobial and 73.8% exhibited a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype. Similarly, 97.9% of environmental isolates were resistant and 75% were MDR. The highest resistance rates in animal and environmental isolates were observed for tetracycline (86.9% and 91.7%, respectively) and ampicillin (82.7% and 85.4%, respectively). These findings reveal a high burden of AMR in backyard poultry environments. The limited implementation of biosecurity measures and frequent contact with wildlife and other animals may contribute to this situation. These results emphasize the importance of including backyard poultry systems in AMR surveillance and control programs under a One Health approach.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceBackyard poultryBiosecurity measuresEscherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID42526089
PMCPMC13449666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.