Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525883›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026

Survival outcomes of dogs with multicentric lymphoma treated with sequential half-body radiotherapy and L-CHOP without maintenance chemotherapy.

Julia Colosi, Michael S Kent, Nicole C Close, Jessica Lawrence, Katherine A Skorupski, Robert B Rebhun, Matthias Rosseel, Sami Al-Nadaf, Amandine T Lejeune

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia ColosiCerro Alto Veterinary Specialty and Emergency Hospital, Oncology Service, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States.
Michael S KentDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-7720
Nicole C CloseEmpiriStat, PO Box 1604, Kitty Hawk, NC 27949, United States.
Jessica LawrenceDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8315-1909
Katherine A SkorupskiDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0324-445X
Robert B RebhunDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8047-3494
Matthias RosseelDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Sami Al-NadafDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Amandine T LejeuneDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Weill School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-8136-9210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundL-CHOP (L-asparaginase, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) is the standard therapy for lymphoma in dogs, but relapse and limited long-term survival are common. Given the radiosensitivity of lymphoma, sequential half-body radiotherapy (HBRT) has been investigated to improve outcomes. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesEvaluate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in dogs treated with a no-maintenance L-CHOP protocol combined with low-dose-rate (LDR, 6 Gy; 8-14 cGy/min) HBRT compared to L-CHOP alone. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs with intermediate- to high-grade multicentric lymphoma treated with L-CHOP-LDR-HBRT or a 6-month L-CHOP protocol (controls).

methodsMedical records were retrospectively reviewed in this case-control study. Adverse events were graded using VCOG-CTCAE v2 (Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events guidelines) criteria.

resultsSeventy-five dogs received L-CHOP-LDR-HBRT and were compared with 115 controls. Median PFS and OS for the L-CHOP-LDR-HBRT group were 532 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 389-782) and 752 days (95% CI, 526-963), significantly longer than in controls (296 days [95% CI, 260-331] and 457 days [95% CI, 382-553], respectively, P < .0001). A delay in irradiating the caudal half negatively affected PFS and OS. Adverse event data were available for 30 dogs treated with L-CHOP-LDR-HBRT; most were low-grade, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurring in 4.5% of all administered treatments. One dog required hospitalization after HBRT. Dose reductions and treatment delays were observed in 39 and 74 instances, respectively, over the 28-week protocol in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Combining L-CHOP with LDR-HBRT, without maintenance chemotherapy, might substantially extend PFS and OS over L-CHOP alone in dogs with multicentric lymphoma, with predominantly mild, manageable toxicities.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDog DiseasesHemibody IrradiationLymphomaAnimalsAsparaginaseCase-Control StudiesCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideDogsDoxorubicinFemaleMalePrednisoneRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAsparaginaseCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneVincristineadverse eventscaninechemoirradiationlow-dose-rate radiationmulticentric lymphomaveterinary

Identifiers

PMID42525883
PMCPMC13419073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.