Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525865›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Social Contagion in COVID-19 Discussions Within the Belgian Reddit Community: Statistical and Modeling Study.

Tim Van Wesemael, Luis Enrique Correa Rocha, Tijs W Alleman, Jan M Baetens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tim Van WesemaelBionamiX, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, Flanders, 9000, Belgium, 32 9 264 59 32.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2105-8805
Luis Enrique Correa RochaDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9046-8739
Tijs W AllemanDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1751-3801
Jan M BaetensBionamiX, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent, Flanders, 9000, Belgium, 32 9 264 59 32.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-9992

Funding

MIDAS Coordination Center - Year 6-10R24GM153920 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 2024 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM153920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding how sentiment toward COVID-19 mitigation measures evolves on social networks can help to inform infectious disease models and policymakers. Even though numerous studies have described social media interactions during the pandemic, few have modeled the underlying dynamics of sentiment contagion and polarization. Objective: This study aimed to investigate topic emergence and sentiment evolution in COVID-19 mitigation discussions on r/Belgium, focusing on (1) whether discussion topics exhibited social contagion, (2) whether expressed sentiment displayed homophily, and (3) how this homophily formation can be captured by a mechanistic model. Methods: We classified posts created on r/Belgium between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, into lockdowns, masks, and vaccination, using a pretrained bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) topic model, and assigned English posts a sentiment, using a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach (RoBERTa)-based sentiment classifier. We then examined temporal patterns of post volume and tested for social contagion in topic initiation. Sentiment homophily was quantified by comparing observed comment-parent sentiment pairs to null distributions. The novel smooth latent-expressed bounded confidence (SLEBC) model dynamically captured sentiment evolution, distinguishing between latent sentiment trajectories and noisy expressed sentiment. We tested the model against 2 alternatives, one with a linear update and one without the latent state, using the Watanabe-Akaike information criterion. Results: Analysis of 655,642 posts made by 28,559 users revealed that post volume was associated with external events such as policy announcements and media reports. There was no evidence of within-Reddit social contagion in topic initiation. However, sentiment exhibited significant homophily, with comment sentiment correlating with parent comment sentiment. The SLEBC model reproduced observed sentiment patterns (Watanabe-Akaike information criterion: -28.5 to -18.4 across topics), outperforming both alternatives (-21.1 to -17.4 for the linear model and 6.8 to 692 for the one without the latent state). It slightly underestimated sentiment homophily but still outperformed the alternatives in this regard. In the SLEBC model, expressed sentiment adapts more strongly to the immediate parent comment than the user's latent state updates based on their interaction history (proportions of users showing this pattern: 0.74, 0.70, and 0.51 for lockdowns, masks, and vaccination). Conclusions: Discussion topics on r/Belgium are not associated with social contagion within the platform, but sentiment dynamics are shaped by within-thread interactions. The SLEBC model suggests that users adapt their expressed sentiment to match the post they reply to, highlighting that expressed sentiment may poorly reflect underlying latent sentiment. Infodemic models for Reddit-like platforms could benefit from incorporating external information sources for topic seeding and from using bounded confidence rather than linear contagion mechanisms for sentiment spread.

Indexed as

COVID-19Models, StatisticalSocial MediaBelgiumHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2bounded-confidence modelCOVID-19 mitigationRedditsentiment analysissocial contagiontopic modeling

Identifiers

PMID42525865
PMCPMC13419282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.