ArticlePloS one2026
Quantitative logics for directed evolution of an asexual population.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Directed evolution of asexual populations is expected to offer a wide range of benefits to humanity. Achieving efficient directed evolution (DE) requires a quantitative formulation of experimental methodologies-or logics-that can address potential challenges throughout the evolutionary process. In this article, ten logics designed for resolving such difficulties when performing DE are introduced. To illustrate their application, a hypothetical scenario is considered in which an imaginary asexual population limb evolves into a wing, using a matrix-based discretization method to represent the trait of interest. Specifically, based on the operator model, fifty simulation iterations with logics applied and thirty iterations without logics were done. The results indicate that the introduced logics can accelerate the evolutionary process by roughly 2.6 times, while achieving an average accuracy for reaching the objective trait of approximately 82%. Based on these findings, key considerations for implementing quantitative logic-based DE are discussed, along with approaches for improving alignment between the final outcome and the target reference trait. Moreover, factors that could contribute to making the quantitative logic-based DE process more practical and rigorous are also examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.