ArticlePloS one2026
Healthcare providers' perspectives and needs related to the management of Pediatric Feeding Disorder: A focus group study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric feeding disorder is a prevalent, impactful diagnosis for children and their families. This diagnosis is heterogenous in presentation and requires the care of a multidisciplinary team of providers. Existing research suggests providers are underprepared to assess and treat pediatric feeding disorder, therefore more information on training and clinical practice is needed. This study conducted focus groups to describe the training journey of providers across all four pediatric feeding disorder domains (medical, nutrition, feeding skill, psychosocial). Seven focus groups (total of 25 providers) were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: differences in academic preparation, workplace infrastructure and access, desire for comprehensiveness and feasibility, and value of the family perspective. Overall, results point to opportunities to improve provider training and therefore patient care including academic exposure to pediatric feeding disorder and multi-disciplinary collaboration practices, increased access to mentorship, training, and evidenced-based resources, and enrichment of the research to practice pipeline with a focus on family-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.