ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Beyond paper walls: From diagnosis to action on visa inequities in global health.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visa inequities in global health have moved from the margins of academic discourse to the centre of a growing reform agenda. While recent literature has established that visa regimes function as structural determinants of global health participation, a critical gap remains: the solution pathways proposed to date remain dispersed across commentaries, editorials and toolkits rather than consolidated into a coordinated operational framework that institutions, conference bodies and funders can act on at scale. This Essay consolidates and builds on that emerging consensus to propose a Global Mobility Equity Framework comprising four interdependent and scalable domains: equitable convening, inclusive participation infrastructure, institutional accountability and distributed visa support systems. Drawing on documented cases spanning the International AIDS Conference, the World Health Summit, the Consortium of Universities for Global Health, and clinical training pathways for foreign medical graduates, we demonstrate that visa barriers impose cascading professional, financial and institutional costs that are systemic in pattern rather than exceptional in nature. We further show that virtual and hybrid conferencing, while promising, does not independently resolve underlying inequities related to connectivity, time zones, language access and the networking disparities that shape career trajectories. The framework we propose is not a restatement of the structural critique as that ground has been well covered. It is a citable, implementable operational response designed to guide coordinated action across global health's institutional landscape. Adopting this framework is a necessary condition for a more representative and effective global health system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.