ArticlePloS one2026
Supporting recovery: Intersections of health, belonging, and help seeking after a campus mass casualty event.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass casualty events (MCE), such as campus shootings, can severely impact the mental health of students, faculty, and staff. This study examined the psychological effects of an MCE at a minority-serving institution and explored how sense of belonging, cardiorespiratory fitness, and treatment preferences influenced recovery. To measure the impact of the MCE on mental health an anonymous survey was administered four to five months post-MCE to university students, faculty and staff. Within the survey, participants were asked to retrospectively report their depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) symptoms as they recalled them two weeks prior to the MCE, and as they experienced them in the two weeks preceding survey completion. The survey also included current measures of sense of belonging (SBS), perceived discrimination (PEDQ), estimated cardiorespiratory fitness (eCRF), and intervention preference to cope with the impacts of the MCE. Participants reported significant perceived increases in PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores from the pre-MCE recall to current time-periods. Increases in depression (PHQ-9 scores) from pre-MCE to recent recall were larger among respondents with lower pre-MCE anxiety (GAD-7 scores), higher perceived discrimination (PEDQ), and those currently receiving treatment for anxiety or depression; respondents not receiving treatment showed no significant change. Among students, lower belonging scores were associated with greater increases in depression. Neither belonging nor perceived discrimination were strongly linked to individual variables, indicating their multifactorial nature. Most participants reported a preference to learning about alternative interventions such as exercise or meditation over pursuing university counseling services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.