ArticlePloS one2026
General healthcare preferences for people aged 50 and over in England: English longitudinal study of ageing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTreatment outcomes and satisfaction improve when healthcare decisions align with patient preferences. However, little is known about general health preferences in older adults, and eliciting patient preferences is time consuming.
aimTo describe the distribution of preferences for healthcare in general, and associations between preferences and patient characteristics in adults aged 50 years and over in England. DESIGN AND
settingData were collected in wave 8 (2016/2017) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a biennial longitudinal survey of people aged 50 and over living in private households in England that began in 2002/2003 and is designed to be nationally representative.
methodData were collected from ELSA participants using face-to-face interviews and a short self completion questionnaire. Amongst other items, the questionnaire contained six measures of general healthcare preferences that had not been asked in previous ELSA waves: risk aversion, future orientation, quality or length of life, body function compared to looks, openness to experimental treatments, and preference to leave treatment decisions to a doctor.
resultsHealthcare preferences varied substantially, with some systematic patterns by age and sex: women were less likely than men to want to delegate decisions to doctors, and more likely to prioritise quality of life over length of life; participants aged over 75 years were more likely than younger participants to want to delegate decisions to doctors, and more likely to want to avoid risks.
conclusionThe systematic sex and age differences offer a useful starting point for eliciting healthcare preferences in a busy clinical environment, but cannot replace asking about individual preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.