ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Dosimetric and clinical validation of a high-density bolus for superficial skin tumors treated with radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate dose deposition in superficial radiotherapy remains challenging due to the inherent skin-sparing effect of megavoltage photon beams and difficulties in ensuring bolus conformity. PURPOSE: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of the room-temperature-malleable high-density bolus, to evaluate the accuracy of dose calculation and to assess clinical outcomes in a clinical cohort of 55 patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe dosimetric validation was performed through the use of dose measurements in a solid water phantom on top of which a 1.0 cm thick high-densitybolus was positioned. Absolute depth dose measurements beyond the bolus were obtained by combining an absolute point dose (ion chamber) measurement at 1.0 cm depth beyond the bolus with relative depth dose measurements by using a microDiamond detector. Measurements were performed using 6 megavoltage (MV) flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams on an Halcyon and on a TrueBeam treatment unit. Obtained data were compared to dose calculations with both photon dose calculations available in the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS): Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB). The impact of non-conforming interfaces was assessed by introducing 0.5 to 2.0 cm thick air cavities between bolus and skin. Skin dose loss due to the air cavities was measured for static open fields and for dynamic sweeping gap fields. Clinical outcomes of 55 patients treated between October 2023 and March 2025 were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsDepth dose measurements confirm that a 1.0 cm high-density bolus was sufficient to effectively overcome the build-up region of the 6FFF photon beam. The AXB dose calculation algorithm provided the best agreement between measurements and calculations. Air gaps between the bolus and the skin resulted in clinically relevant skin dose reductions, ranging from approximately 1% to 20%, depending on field size and gap thickness, especially for clinical target volumes < 5.0 cm, large (> 1.0 cm) air gaps, or the use of large static fields. Among the 55 included patients, acute dermatitis toxicity was predominantly Grade 1 (49%) or Grade 2 (47.0%), with a low incidence of severe adverse events (Grade III: 4 %, Grade IV: 0%).
conclusionThe high-density bolus demonstrated satisfying dosimetric reliability, particularly when modeled with the Acuros XB algorithm. The bolus addressed the build-up challenge inherent to MV photons, even in the presence of small air gaps, without increased toxicity in a large cohort of patients. This strategy represents a viable and accessible solution for ensuring accurate and conformal dose delivery in superficial tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.