Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525457›Full record

ArticleEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2026

Left Ventricular Mechanics and Myocardial Work in Competitive Sprinters.

Esra Poyraz, Fatma Can

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Esra PoyrazDepartment of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0010-6545
Fatma CanDepartment of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSprint exercise is characterized by repeated short-duration high-intensity anaerobic activity associated with distinct hemodynamic and autonomic adaptations. However, the effects of long-term sprint training on left ventricular (LV) mechanics and myocardial work (MW) parameters remain insufficiently investigated. This study aimed to evaluate LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and MW indices in competitive sprinters.

methodsA total of 65 competitive sprinters and 40 age- and sex-matched healthy sedentary controls were prospectively enrolled. All participants underwent comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, including two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and non-invasive myocardial work analysis. GLS, global myocardial work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global myocardial work efficiency (GWE) were quantified.

resultsResting heart rate was significantly lower, whereas stroke volume was significantly higher in sprinters compared with controls. However, LV GLS and principal MW indices, including GWI, GCW, GWW, and GWE, were comparable between groups (all p > 0.05). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility for MW measurements demonstrated good-to-excellent agreement.

conclusionLong-term sprint training appears to be associated with preserved myocardial mechanics and myocardial work indices despite chronic exposure to high-intensity anaerobic exercise, supporting the presence of physiological rather than maladaptive cardiac adaptation in competitive sprinters.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHeart VentriclesMyocardial ContractionRunningVentricular Function, LeftAdultFemaleGlobal Longitudinal StrainHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsStroke Volumeglobal longitudinal strainmyocardial work parameterssprinter

Identifiers

PMID42525457
PMCPMC13421009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.