ArticleJAMA network open2026
Cervical Cancer Screening With Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection Testing in an Opioid Treatment Program.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Individuals with opioid use disorder and substance use disorder have lower cervical cancer screening rates than the general population. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection testing provides opportunities to expand screening access to previously unreached patient populations. Objectives: To assess the feasibility and uptake of incorporating HPV self-collection testing for cervical cancer screening into routine care for patients with opioid use disorder and substance use disorder, and to track the rates of high-risk HPV and guideline concordant follow-up care in this population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from June 24, 2024, through December 31, 2025, at We Care Daily Clinics, a federally certified opioid treatment program (OTP) and American Indian Health Facility in Auburn, Washington. Eligible patients were 25 years or older, had a cervix, and were either overdue for cervical cancer screening or unsure of their last screening. Intervention: Screening using self-collection kits was offered during the patient's annual wellness visit, and self-collection occurred privately in the clinic restroom. Samples were analyzed for 14 high-risk HPV types at a laboratory. Screened patients with HPV-positive results received education and recommendations for guideline-concordant care. OTP staff facilitated patient referrals to local clinicians for gynecologic services, and follow-up was tracked. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the rates of HPV self-collection testing uptake, HPV positivity, and successful linkage to follow-up care. Results: A total of 194 patients (median [range] age, 41 [25-65] years) were evaluated. Of 174 patients (89.7%) eligible for cervical cancer screening, 158 (90.8%) completed HPV self-collection testing. There were 0 unsatisfactory test results, and 128 patients (81.0%) had HPV-negative results, 7 (4.4%) had HPV-16- or HPV-18-positive results, and 23 (14.6%) had positive results for other high-risk HPV types (non-HPV-16 or HPV-18 types only). Of the 30 patients with HPV-positive test results, 2 (6.7%) were lost to follow-up and 12 (40.0%) completed follow-up to date, which often required multiple coordination attempts by clinicians. The remaining 16 of 30 patients (53.3%) are currently actively engaged in various stages of referral and scheduling. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, incorporation of cervical cancer screening into an OTP using HPV self-collection testing was feasible with high patient eligibility and uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.