Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525375›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Cave canem: an unusual case of indoor scavenging and review of the literature.

Ilaria Tarozzi, Alice Buzzelli, Luigi Mastrogiuseppe, Valentina Bugelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilaria TarozziDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Alice BuzzelliDepartment of Legal Medicine, University of Parma, Viale Antonio Gramsci, 14, Parma, 43100, Italy. alice.buzzelli@unipr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6001-438X
Luigi MastrogiuseppeMolise Regional Health Agency, Dipartimento di Prevenzione A.S.Re.M, Servizio Veterinario-I.A.P.Z, Piazza della Vittoria 14, 86100, Campobasso, Italia.
Valentina BugelliDepartment of Legal Medicine, University of Parma, Viale Antonio Gramsci, 14, Parma, 43100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal scavenging is a common occurrence in forensic casework worldwide. Determining the cause of death in a mutilated body, estimating the time between death and the onset of mutilation, and understanding the factors underlying animal activity are among the challenges posed by animal predation in domestic environments. According to forensic literature between 1994 and 2023, social isolation is a common risk factor for pet scavenging. The authors present a singular case involving dog scavenging of a corpse in an advanced state of decomposition, with partial loss of splanchnocranium bones. The body was found in an apartment in poor hygienic conditions, where the decedent lived alone with a Bracco-pointer dog. In the reported case, the decedent was unemployed and had limited contact with family. A forensic veterinary expert was consulted and indicated that a dog of similar breed and size could completely consume pig bone remains within less than one week. In contrast, the incomplete removal of the skull observed in this case may be explained by premature cessation of feeding due to accelerated body decomposition in a warm environment. Consistent with previous research, the death was attributed to ischemic cardiovascular disease. Death investigation in cases of indoor animal scavenging requires a careful scene examination and close collaboration between forensic pathologists and veterinary experts to reconstruct scavenging patterns and support the exclusion of antemortem trauma.

Indexed as

DecompositionDog scavengingForensic pathologyForensic veterinaryIndoor scavenging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.