ReviewPain and therapy2026
Uncovering Neuropathic Pain in CANVAS: Lessons from a Case-Based Literature Review.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct small-fiber dysfunction profiles in CMT1A and RFC1 disease: a multimodal study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebellar ataxia with neuronopathy and vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) is a rare, late-onset neurodegenerative disorder caused by biallelic intronic AAGGG repeat expansions in the RFC1 gene. Its phenotype is heterogeneous, ranging from isolated sensory neuronopathy to the full clinical triad. Although neuronopathy is present in the majority-if not all-of the cases, the prevalence and clinical significance of neuropathic pain remain insufficiently characterized.
methodsWe report a genetically confirmed case of CANVAS in a 58-year-old woman presenting predominantly with asymmetrical neuropathic pain. Clinical, neurophysiological, vestibular, and genetic assessments were performed, with longitudinal follow-up over 3 years. Additionally, a case-driven systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was conducted in May 2026 in two databases (MEDLINE and Scopus) that identified cohorts of CANVAS cases with data on pain. Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence of neuropathic pain was calculated using a random-effects model.
resultsThe systematic review included 445 patients with CANVAS. The pooled prevalence of neuropathic pain was 43.2% (95% confidence intervals 34.0-52.9%) with moderate heterogeneity across these studies (I
conclusionsNeuropathic pain is a frequent and potentially early manifestation of CANVAS, likely reflecting underlying sensory neuronopathy. CANVAS should be considered in patients with idiopathic sensory neuronopathy, even when pain is present. Early recognition and targeted genetic testing are essential to improve diagnosis and optimize patient management in this underdiagnosed condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.