ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2026
Primate-ungulate sympatry: a review of ecological interactions and research perspectives.
Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The co-occurrence of species within the same area raises fundamental questions about how they can persist while sharing space and resources. One of the central aims of community ecology is to understand the processes that allow species to coexist over time. The sympatry between primates and ungulates has not received much specialized attention, despite long-term acknowledgment that the two groups frequently co-occur. In this contribution, we have reviewed and summarized empirical evidence from a set of published studies to determine the nature of primate and ungulate association in space and time, the ecological contexts within which such associations occur, and the types of interactions that have been reported. We particularly examined the trends in the study taxa, the geographic distribution of research, and the functional categories of interactions. Within the literature, interspecific interactions are frequently reported in Africa, between baboons (Papio sp.) and small to medium-sized ungulates. Foraging facilitation and antipredator benefits are among the most frequently documented interaction types, typically resulting in commensalistic or asymmetrical mutualistic outcomes favouring ungulate species. Nonetheless, mutualism and antagonistic interactions are also reported, which indicates the context-dependent nature of these relationships. The frequency and form of associations appear to further depend on seasonal variation and habitat structure, although these factors were not consistently taken into account in the studies considered in this review. This synthesis helps establish a set of research priorities to promote more systematic and focused studies of primate-ungulate sympatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.