Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525326›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026

Evaluation of generative adversarial network-based postprocessing super-resolution for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging.

Yasuo Takatsu, Kazuki Takano, Shohei Harada, Hayato Takeda, Masafumi Nakamura, Akiyoshi Iwase, Atsushi Ikemoto, Tosiaki Miyati, Soma Kumasaka

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yasuo TakatsuGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. yasuo.takatsu@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-089X
Kazuki TakanoDepartment of Molecular Imaging, Clinical Collaboration Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Shohei HaradaGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Hayato TakedaGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Masafumi NakamuraDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Tokushima Bunri University, 8-53 Hamanocho, Takamatsu city, Kagawa, 760-8542, Japan.
Akiyoshi IwaseDepartment of Radiology, Fujita Health University Hospital, 1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Atsushi IkemotoMedical Imaging Center of Manryoukai, 1-8-3, Sanno, Nishinari-ku, Osaka, 557-0001, Japan.
Tosiaki MiyatiDivision of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-0942, Japan.
Soma KumasakaDepartment of Applied Medical Imaging, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3‑39‑22 Showa‑machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371‑8511, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility of generative adversarial network (GAN)-based postprocessing super-resolution for T2-weighted lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using both objective resolution metrics and perceptual assessment. Sagittal lumbar spine MRI datasets from healthy volunteers were analyzed. An enhanced super-resolution GAN (ESRGAN) was trained on downsampled images, while zero-filling, bicubic, and bilinear interpolation, as well as enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution (EDSR), were used as comparators. Image quality was assessed by comparing upscaled images from 256 × 256 acquisitions with corresponding 512 × 512 reference images, using full width at half maximum (FWHM) and normalized integrated power spectrum (NIPS), along with similarity metrics including structural similarity index, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and root mean square error. Subjective image quality was evaluated using a ranking method. An additional analysis using 320 × 320 and 640 × 640 image pairs was conducted to assess consistency across resolution settings. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Friedman test with Bonferroni correction. ESRGAN showed no significant differences from the original high-resolution images in FWHM and NIPS, whereas interpolation methods and EDSR demonstrated inferior performance (P < 0.05). Although interpolation methods achieved higher scores in pixel-wise metrics, ESRGAN obtained the highest subjective ratings and interrater agreement. These findings indicate that ESRGAN better restores high-frequency structural information not captured by conventional similarity metrics. GAN-based postprocessing super-resolution may improve image quality in lumbar spine MRI and warrants further investigation of its clinical impact.

Indexed as

Generative Adversarial NetworksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioESRGANFWHMLumbar spineMagnetic resonance imagingNormalized integrated power spectrum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.