ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
pLAST-a tool for rapid comparison and classification of bacterial plasmid sequences.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe increasing number of fully sequenced bacterial plasmids being annotated and catalogued has prompted the development of computational tools for comparing and classifying them. Existing approaches typically compare full-length DNA sequences (e.g. Mash, BLASTn, and ANI-based methods) or translated open reading frames (ORFs) (e.g. DIAMOND), with plasmid-level scores obtained by aggregating ORF-to-ORF similarities; however, they are either restricted to closely related plasmids or become computationally demanding in large-scale analyses.
resultsWe describe pLAST (plasmid Language Analysis and Search Tool), a plasmid-search tool built using word2vec representations of protein-family content informed by local genomic context. Benchmarks indicate that pLAST outperforms nucleotide-based methods and performs comparably to DIAMOND in identifying functionally similar plasmids and compared with the widely used Mash, it achieves 26% and 24% improvements in detecting shared mating-pair formation system type and relaxase type, respectively. This performance scales to database searches across hundreds of thousands of sequences, as demonstrated using the precomputed PlasmidScope collection of ∼750 000 plasmids. Beyond global similarity, pLAST also returns per-ORF plasmid-plasmid alignments, enabling detection of shared functional modules. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: pLAST is freely accessible as a web server at https://plast.lbs.cent.uw.edu.pl/ or https://plast.lbs.biol.uw.edu.pl/ and available as a Python module along with a precomputed database at https://github.com/labstructbioinf/pLAST for customized analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.