ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Hybrid approach with convolutional neural network and regression models for age estimation in panoramic radiographs.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetermining chronological age is a relevant aspect of criminal and civil interest for identifying corpses and refugees. This study aimed to estimate chronological age using a hybrid model that combines a convolutional neural network (CNN) with regression models based on panoramic radiographs.
methodsThis observational, retrospective and cross-sectional study analyzed 2,546 panoramic radiographs from a Brazilian practice. Panoramic radiographs of patients over 18 years old with healthy, erupted lower premolars were selected. The radiographs were segmented using GIMP, and the dataset was divided into three sets: 70% for model training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing. Based on the MobileNetV2 architecture, the CNN model extracted 576 attributes from each image, which were then used in conjunction with a decision-tree regression model to estimate age. To evaluate the model's performance, metrics such as Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Coefficient of Determination and Mean Square Error were used.
results3,423 teeth were analyzed, and the patients' mean age was 32.65 years. The overall MAE was 6.52 years (R² = 0.67); however, for the age group 31 to 35, the hybrid AI model had an MAE of 0.29 years for the male sample and 0.16 years for the female sample.
conclusionsThe hybrid AI model proved accurate and robust for patients aged 31-35 years; however, in other age groups, the model performed unsatisfactorily, particularly in the 40-50 and 51-55 age ranges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42525244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.