ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Accuracy of multimodal intravascular imaging in evaluating neointimal tissue in a swine femoropopliteal artery stent model.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stent failure, including in-stent restenosis (ISR) and occlusion, remains a major challenge in femoropopliteal arteries. Since the underlying cause of stent failure, such as fibrin-rich thrombus versus organized fibrous plaque, likely dictates the optimal treatment strategy, accurate characterization of neointimal tissue is crucial. However, pathological validation for key intravascular imaging modalities in this setting is lacking. A total of 22 femoral arteries with an in-stent restenosis model in healthy swine after stent implantation were evaluated. One month later, intravascular imaging using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI), and angioscopy was performed. Diagnostic accuracy for characterizing neointimal tissue ≥ 1000 μm (thick neointima) was assessed using histology as the gold standard. For detecting fibrin/organizing thrombus, IVUS showed high specificity (96%) but poor sensitivity (13%), leading to underestimation. Conversely, OFDI offered relatively high sensitivity (60%) but a modest positive predictive value (PPV, 50%), risking overestimation. A paired use of IVUS and OFDI approach overcame these limitations, yielding significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 50%, specificity 96%, PPV 83%). While angioscopy showed excellent specificity (100%), its utility was limited by very low sensitivity (24%). Paired use of IVUS and OFDI may improve diagnostic confidence for neointimal tissue characterization. In contrast, the utility of angioscopy appears limited due to low sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.