Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42525197›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in tissue repair and regeneration.

Wolfgang Schaden, Paul Slezak, Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü, David Hercher, Heinz Kuderna, Rainer Mittermayr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wolfgang SchadenLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Paul SlezakLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Can Gollmann-TepeköylüDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Regeneration Research, Innsbruck, Austria.
David HercherLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz KudernaLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Rainer MittermayrLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria. rainer.mittermayr@lbg.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2897-2923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the development of shockwave therapy in medicine, from the first scientific description, through reports of soldiers injured by shockwaves during World War I and World War II, to the first clinical application for kidney stone fragmentation on February 7, 1980. Initially, attention focused on the destructive mechanical effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) until it was recognized-often serendipitously-that shockwaves possess enormous regenerative potential. Through close collaboration between clinical practice and basic research, it has become possible to understand how the compressive, tensile, and shear forces generated by shockwaves affect tissue. Thus, over the past 30 years, more than 100 new indications for shockwaves have been developed from the four originally known. The realization that shockwaves not only improve blood flow by stimulating angiogenesis and vasculogenesis but also mobilize the body's own stem cells to enable local regeneration renders them of increasingly great interest to nearly all medical disciplines.

Indexed as

BiosurgeryNonivasive TreatmentProphylaxisSurgical ComplicationsWound Healing Disturbences

Identifiers

PMID42525197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.